A few days before the presidential elections in Peru, the uncertainty grows, but we also, as far as media is concerned, it seems that the anti-Ollanta and Keiko is taking anti-body, which may convince the undecided sector. However, achieving or not votes are concentrated in Toledo, Kuczynski Castañeda or be able to proceed to the second round, we can not ignore the fact that the population is believed to Ollanta and Keiko and that together their shares, representing half of the country. Then, against whom are we supposed to? against these candidates? or do we beat the other half of Peru? If this time these two candidates do not achieve their objectives, which will still exists between some of this population will be a lot of discontent, will continue to think that politicians are corrupt, impoverished and that nobody will continue to represent them. Somehow, then, we participated in a division. The main argument used against these two candidates is their lack of commitment to democracy. Argument, as I mentioned in a previous post, little seems to matter to this half of citizens. Therefore, I believe, a necessary and urgent among all Peruvians is to analyze, reflect and seek ways to lay a clear basis for democracy. This is not accused of ignorance is not a democratic conscience. Attitudes like this further divide the country and feed an ideal spot for those liderzuelos spirit. You have to work through dialogue and not to air paternalistic. And this is not going to solve in four days before the vote, but we must begin.
0 comments:
Post a Comment